On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 06:35:12PM +0000, Eduardo Horvath wrote: > Since the original disussion I looked into this a bit and I'm not > convinced it's a good idea. I'm afraid if we unhook lfs from ffs it will > suffer from extreme bitrot. Even with the current situation it was > completely nonfunctional four months ago.
Yes, the idea here is to get it fixed. Currently, it's broken largely because it's a mess. Sharing ufs is a substantial part of why it's a mess. Anyhow, it seems to me that isolating it from changes to ffs is likely to result in less breakage over time, not more. Can you expand on your reasoning some? -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
