On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:26:42AM -0500, der Mouse wrote: > > (2) does anyone think that a correct namei design should provide a > > correct canonicalized full pathname for its inspection during lookup? > > Not me. > > > (Note that this is free -- it would require splicing a getcwd into > > every namei call.) > > _Not_ free, I assume you mean?
er right, silly editor... :-/ Anyway, it looks as if it's not needed. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org