>>> (Note that this is free -- it would require splicing a getcwd into >>> every namei call.) >> _Not_ free, I assume you mean? > er right, silly editor... :-/
:-รพ I've had that happen to me often enough. > Anyway, it looks as if it's not needed. Just as well. It has (since) occurred to me that it won't even work, unless you're willing to accept a regression in that it will totally break namei when the current directory no longer has any name. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
