On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 09:19:30AM -0500, matthew sporleder wrote: > > [TRYEMULROOT] > > Since it's on http://www.netbsd.org/~dholland/buglists/file.html , I'm > sure you're aware of it, but would 41678 be solved? > > http://gnats.NetBSD.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=41678
Doubtful, as that behavior's inside onionfs. I don't think applying the same simplification to onionfs would result in the behavior you want there, either. (Anyhow, like I wrote in that PR, the only real way forward for onionfs is to try to figure out a self-consistent model for the semantics. If as I suspect that turns out to be impossible, the right way forward is to kill onionfs and replace it with several similar fses each with a clear set of semantics specialized for a particular set of purposes.) -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
