On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 07:04:56PM +0000, David Laight wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 12:01:17AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote: > > IMO emul lookup is completely a hack, and it should be redesigned > > using per-process namespace.... > > It is a lot less of a hack than what went before. > The only other option would be an actual (working) union mount, > and that has much bigger problems - not to mention needing > process specific mount tables!
Bigger problems, yes. But the only real solution! > > OTOH I do wish the 32bit/64bit compatibility had been done as part of > the '64bit' port - so that the 64bit userspace doesn't have to rename > anything from the 32bit version - giving you a userpace that can > (at least in theory) boot either a 32bit or 64bit kernel. Do you mean multilib directories? > > David > > -- > David Laight: da...@l8s.co.uk
