> > > > that seems reasonable to me. > > > > > > What do you propose then ? quotactl is the best name I can find for this > > > syscall ... > > > > quotactl2? quotapctl? quota_pctl? quotactl_the_next_generation? > > ... quota_king? > > All are > > > > Considering that quotactl is not used by programmers (unless they're > > hacking on the quota utils ;) I don't think we need to spend a lot > > someone who looks at quotactl(8) will also look at quotactl(2) ... > > > of energy on picking the name. If we want to follow a common naming > > Agreed. So let's keep quotactl(2) ... it's fine and is working.
i'd rather use quotactl2() than the old name. other ideas: quotapropctl() quotaprop() and i'd be ok with quotapctl() as well. .mrg.