On Thu Mar 10 2011 at 11:28:14 +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > > Considering that quotactl is not used by programmers (unless they're > > hacking on the quota utils ;) I don't think we need to spend a lot > > someone who looks at quotactl(8) will also look at quotactl(2) ...
You can still MLINKS the quotactl.2 name or add a note. > > of energy on picking the name. If we want to follow a common naming > > Agreed. So let's keep quotactl(2) ... it's fine and is working. I don't agree about "fine", but I won't push the issue any further. -- älä karot toivorikkauttas, kyl rätei ja lumpui piisaa
