(more context restored) On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:51:48AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote: >>>>>> (also, edquota and repquota seem fs-independent to me...) >>>>> >>>>> no, they're not: they can directly the quota1 file specified in the >>>>> fstab if quotactl fails or the filesystem is not mounted. >>>> >>>> That's a bug, or more accurately legacy behavior that doesn't need to >>>> be supported. >>> >>> of course it's not nice. But we're talking about existing code calling the >>> legacy quotactl. If we're going to change it to not check the fstab >>> options any more, we may as well change it to use libquota. >> >> I don't understand - surely edquota and repquota go through your >> proplib interface now? > > We were talking about code like netatalk, which is why I propose > a public library for this.
Uh, now I really don't understand. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org