On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 09:33:54 +0100 Nicolas Joly <nj...@pasteur.fr> wrote:
> According to the online OpenGroup specification for read(2) available > at [1], read(2) on directories is implementation dependant. If > unsupported, it shall fail with EISDIR. In the case of sys/rump/librump/rumpvfs/rumpfs.c, is it possible that the underlaying implementation could previously decide if it could support read(2) on directories, and this would no longer be the case with this patch? Thanks, -- Matt