On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:56:32 +0100 Nicolas Joly <nj...@pasteur.fr> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 04:36:55AM -0500, Matthew Mondor wrote: > > In the case of sys/rump/librump/rumpvfs/rumpfs.c, is it possible that > > the underlaying implementation could previously decide if it could > > support read(2) on directories, and this would no longer be the case > > with this patch? > > No. This only impact the rump fs itself (used as the root file system > in applications); its does not matter while accessing other fs through > rump. Thanks for the explanation, -- Matt
