On Aug 11, 12:40pm, m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) wrote: -- Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
| Christos Zoulas <chris...@zoulas.com> wrote: | | > I could believe that, if the change suggested to make this the default | > behavior (which some would argue it should be...) | | In an ideal world, we would set _UC_TLSBASE by default (as it is today, | except on powerpc), and we would automatically ignore _UC_TLSBASE when | l->l_proc->p_nlwps > 1, since we cannot think of a sane usage for that. Well, why don't we make it that way then? christos
