On Aug 11, 5:13pm, m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) wrote: -- Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
| > Well, why don't we make it that way then? | | We cannot toggle an option that does not exist, so that require adding | _UC_TLSBASE for ports that miss it. This meets a strong opposition for | now. Again, if there is no consensus in the lists, we'll have to let core decide. christos
