On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Masao Uebayashi <uebay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Ryota Ozaki <ozak...@netbsd.org> wrote: >>> I'd change if__pad1 to if_flags2 and define IFF2_SLOWTIMO_MPSAFE etc. >> >> Hmm, I think it's a last resort. I don't want to do something like >> (ifp->if_flags & IFF_XXX) && (ifp->if_flags2 & IFF_XXX2) if possible. >> >> I'm thinking more to avoid the separation. > > It's a temporary measure until a good struct ifnet will be designed.
If it's a temporal solution, I have no objection :) > > I propose to keep ABI by reusing if__pad1. If you propose ABI > breakage, you should understand it and estimate the impact by > yourself. :) Of course, I'm thinking a way without ABI breakage. ozaki-r
