On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Masao Uebayashi <uebay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Ryota Ozaki <ozak...@netbsd.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Masao Uebayashi <uebay...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I overlooked you've back out the struct callout * dynamic allocation >>> part. Can you make it use kmem as I showed? >> >> Hmm, I'll do so, although I don't yet understand why the pointer version >> is better than the embedded version. > > You told that the pseudo interfaces have no watchdog/slowtimo. > Routers might have thousands of pseudo interfaces. I'd save 10 > pointers there. struct ifnet is already too big.
Sure. I'm persuaded :) Thanks, ozaki-r > > But it's also true that callout_t is designed to be opaque to be > embedded in other structs.
