On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:01:02PM +0000, paul_kon...@dell.com wrote: > > But I too find it regrettable and possibly dangerous. One of my > > copious-spare-time projects is to dig up enough specs to add a DECnet > > stack to my systems; > > DECnet phase IV specs are readily available and good enough to > build interoperable implementations (which isn?t true, > unfortunately, for a lot of protocol specs). DECnet Phase IV > (DECnet/OSI) specs also have been uncovered, though they are in > more obscure spots. And DECnet nodes exist around the Internet; > the ?Hobbyist DECnet? group (?hecnet?) is the main focus of that > activity as far as I know. > > If you want pointers to documents, just ask, I can supply those.
slightly relatedly, do you (or anyone else reading this) happen to know what happened to the mopd patches described in PR 3344? -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
