On Fri, 29 May 2015 12:22:40 +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:

> On 2015-05-29 08:18, Matt Thomas wrote:
> >
> > I have a Phase IV+ (so I didn't have to much with the physical address) impl
ementation but never got around to writing the apps.  socket interface is ident
ical to DECnet-ULTRIX.  DAP is a beast as is CTERM.  I could run IP protocols o
ver, but then I have IP for that. :)

> > I never committed it because I doubted there was interest.  It’s probably 
> > bi
t rotted but I could resurrect it.
> 
> Well, me for one would be interested...
> 

Mee too. It would not include LAT though, would it?

Anders

Reply via email to