On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:47:01AM -0700, Dennis Ferguson wrote: > Asking for ARCNET support in the absence of hardware to test on, > however, is really asking for something quite different. Since you > can't make more than small, mechanical changes to anything and expect > it to work without testing (and I'm not even sure about the small, > mechanical changes) what is being asked instead is that nothing be > done that requires changes to the ARCNET code on the disk right > now, nor the framework it relies on to operate, while making it > someone else's problem to figure out how to deal with that constraint. > This isn't fair, and I don't think it has any possibility of working.
Amen. Joerg