Johnny Billquist <b...@softjar.se> writes: > On 2015-06-04 09:43, Matt Thomas wrote: >> >>> On Jun 3, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Aleksej Saushev <a...@inbox.ru> wrote: >>> >>> Just in case you don't know, nearly any user has libxml2 and libxslt >>> installed anyway. >> >> None of my systems do. > > I thought Aleksej was joking... The suggestion to get rid of > groff because it needed C++, and replace it with XML, a full > blown web browser, and god know how many libraries seemed like > the ultimate joke.
Have you ever tried checking what you use in an argument? Obviously, not. I don't see another sensible explanation to this lie. It is definitely not hard to issue two(!) commands to check it: $ pkg_info -n libxml2 Information for libxml2-2.9.2nb2: Requires: xmlcatmgr>=2.0beta1 $ pkg_info -n xmlcatmgr Information for xmlcatmgr-2.2nb1: Same applies to web browser. This is not 1995, there's a number of different web browsers out there. Some of them are pretty minimal. For instance, Lynx can be built with dependencies only on curses, gettext, openssl and zlib. -- HE CE3OH...
