On 2015-06-04 12:44, Robert Swindells wrote:
Johnny Billquist <b...@softjar.se> wrote:
On 2015-06-04 09:43, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Jun 3, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Aleksej Saushev <a...@inbox.ru> wrote:
Just in case you don't know, nearly any user has libxml2 and libxslt
installed anyway.
None of my systems do.
I thought Aleksej was joking... The suggestion to get rid of groff
because it needed C++, and replace it with XML, a full blown web
browser, and god know how many libraries seemed like the ultimate joke.
What happened to the original roff? I mean, groff is just a gnu
replacement for roff. Maybe switch back to the original?
The sources to all of DWB are available from AT&T:
<http://www2.research.att.com/~astopen/download/>
It needs a bit of work to get it to build on NetBSD though.
Hmm. What about roff from 2.11BSD? That shouldn't be so hard to get
building on NetBSD...
Johnny
