> On Aug 12, 2016, at 3:24 PM, Jaromír Doleček <jaromir.dole...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > ... > We do have crc32 support in libkern, so I was thinking doing something along > that. > ... > What is general option, is there any interest to have crc32c support > consolidated into a lib, should I put some efford into making this shared > code? It adds some kernel bloat, so I'm slightly reluctant.
It seems sensible. It could be done by a common CRC routine that takes a table pointer argument, then the two specific routines are just wrappers. paul