On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:39:42PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote: > Can you tell me who maintains them, or if nobody does, can you > volunteer to maintain them -- by auditing them, by testing them if > someone else applies a security fix, by writing automatic tests with > sample binaries that we can put into atf?
I can promise to try to solve any COMPAT_LINUX bug, although I don't promise to succeed. I find it useful, we even have packages relying on its existence, and its nice that they work out of the box, but adding a note to all of them isn't bad. Most of these packages are in pkgsrc/games, but there are some other notable software that has been reported to run under COMPAT_LINUX (recently manu@ added pselect6 stating it allows MATLAB R2016A to run). > P.S. The old-NetBSD, a.out, and 32-bit compat modules may be broken > too, and are probably not automatically tested either, but are more > likely to be manually tested and I'm not addressing them right now. > These are: netbsd/mips64 runs a 64bit kernel and full 32bit userland, so compat_netbsd32 is tested very heavily on it.
