In article <02c36311-2fcd-08cf-cc71-b472e7c01...@iij.ad.jp>, Kengo NAKAHARA <k-nakah...@iij.ad.jp> wrote: >Hi, > >We implement ipsec(4) pseudo interface for route-based VPNs. This pseudo >interface manages its security policy(SP) by itself, in particular, we do > # ifconfig ipsec0 tunnel 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 >the SPs "10.0.0.1 -> 10.0.0.2"(out) and "10.0.0.2 -> 10.0.0.1"(in) are >generated automatically and atomically. And then, when we do > # ifconfig ipsec0 deletetunnel >the SPs are destroyed automatically and atomically, too. > >Here is the patches and an unified patch. > http://netbsd.org/~knakahara/if_ipsec/if_ipsec.tgz > http://netbsd.org/~knakahara/if_ipsec/if_ipsec-unified.patch > >By the way, I have one question. In the above patch(s), I temporarily add >manual for ipsecX pseudo interface as if_ipsec.4, because there is already >ipsec.4 for general ipsec protocol. How should I add the man of ipsec(4) >pseudo interface? > (a) Add if_ipsec.4 > (b) move current ipsec.4(for ipsec protocol) to ipsec.9, and then > add ipsec.4(for ipsec pseudo interface) > (c) any other > >Could you comment the patch or the question?
I've wanted this feature for a long time! Looks ok to me, but the sockaddr_copy()/port setting code, should be abstracted to a single function since it is repeated in ioctl(). christos
