> On Jun 30, 2019, at 10:15 AM, Christos Zoulas <chris...@zoulas.com> wrote: > > I think that our goal is be able to branch 9 with a gdb that works as well as > 7 (since it is more broken in 8 because of the 64->32 breakage). Yah, that's fair... I just think we need to not lose sight of the bigger picture so that we don't paint ourselves into a corner. > > christos -- thorpej
- Re: re-enabling debugging of 32 bit pr... Jason Thorpe
- Re: re-enabling debugging of 32 b... Andrew Cagney
- Re: re-enabling debugging of 32 bit pr... Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: re-enabling debugging of 32 b... Jason Thorpe
- Re: re-enabling debugging of ... Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: re-enabling debugging of ... Jason Thorpe
- Re: re-enabling debugging of ... Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: re-enabling debugging of ... Jason Thorpe
- Re: re-enabling debugging of ... Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: re-enabling debugging of ... Christos Zoulas
- Re: re-enabling debugging of ... Jason Thorpe
- Re: re-enabling debugging of ... Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: re-enabling debugging of 32 bit proces... Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: re-enabling debugging of 32 bit processes with... Martin Husemann
- re: re-enabling debugging of 32 bit processes with 64 b... matthew green
- Re: re-enabling debugging of 32 bit processes with... Michael van Elst
- Re: re-enabling debugging of 32 bit processes ... Christos Zoulas
- Re: re-enabling debugging of 32 bit proces... Michael van Elst
- Re: re-enabling debugging of 32 bit pr... Christos Zoulas
- Re: re-enabling debugging of 32 b... Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: re-enabling debugging of ... Andrew Cagney