In article <qfd1sp$9bj$1...@serpens.de>, Michael van Elst <mlel...@serpens.de> wrote: >chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes: > >>We can fill them completely with 0 as we pad with 0 the 32 bit >>part of the 64 bit registers that does not exist in a 32 bit >>process. > >The corefile pretends to be a 32bit file, so the register >section should probably be similar to a coredump of a >32bit system. > >N.B. two registers were not zero padded, a temporary and the 'hi' >register. So I don't think there is padding (or truncating) >done.
I have not looked at the core file, I was referring to what should be returned by PT_GETREGS in the 64 bit tracer 32 bit tracee case. christos
