* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2007-05-10 11:31:22]:
> On Thursday 10 May 2007 02:36, Juiceman wrote: > > On 5/9/07, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > > > This is not exactly what you are looking for but I am 90% finished > > coding a config option to have the store and the cache be non-equal > > and user configurable in size. This could be changed manually as > > often as you wished as your store filled up. > > > > I was going to run it by the list after I had completed it. > > > > This was something that I wanted to see if I could figure out how to > > do (whether or not it gets merged into the codebase.) > > As long as it's an expert option, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be > accepted. Preventing users from their stupidity ? We don't want everyone to have a cache but no specialized data on the basis that "with a bigger cache downloads are 'resuming' ; I don't care about others nor the network so I only cache" NextGen$ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20070510/65c66683/attachment.pgp>
