On Thursday 10 May 2007 11:52, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2007-05-10 11:31:22]: > > > > As long as it's an expert option, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't > > be accepted. > > Preventing users from their stupidity ? > > We don't want everyone to have a cache but no specialized data on the > basis that "with a bigger cache downloads are 'resuming' ; I don't care > about others nor the network so I only cache"
Fair point. If they want to break their node that much they can maintain a fork. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20070510/a4bc90fe/attachment.pgp>
