Matthew Toseland wrote: > That's completely different. Real time chat over Freenet, with both peers > anonymised, is not currently feasible (well there are prototypes with ~ 15 > second latency, but IMHO it will be slow and rely on some unreliable > mechanisms...)
Hmm, I wonder if freenet would be usable for a twitter-style communication. Twitter's needs for "real-time" are much less, and the broadcast nature of twitter might fit freenet's architecture. Just a quick thought. E
