On Tuesday 20 January 2009 00:22, [Anon] Anon User > wrote: > -----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE----- > Message-type: plaintext > > In <21718dc00901191537o2b4f286k990f75fc1caa91ea at mail.gmail.com> 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i <3buib3s50i at gmail.com> wrote: > >The blocking is arbitrary, upon request of the majors. Majors give IP > >addresses to a high authority, and high authority blocks the Internet > >connection, without legal proceedings. People can not defend > >themselves. It is even impossible to denounce a neighbor who uses our > >wireless connection: the French state provides software to protect > >connections, and it consider that the owner of the connection is > >protected and responsibly. The European Parliament is against French > >law, but no European law has been passed yet. The French minister of > >culture want several hundred million of sanctions per year without > >legal proceedings. > > > > In that case, anyone using anything that requires high bandwidth could be accused > of sharing illegal files without even evidence. > > Freenet very much needs to be able to cloak it's traffic within "safe" > protocols and ports to protect it's users from terrorist governments > like the French people must suffer.
Unfortunately evil governments can identify peer to peer traffic even if it is HTTP, simply by the fact that it is peer to peer - it originates and ends on a domestic IP address. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20090121/3d33e4de/attachment.pgp>
