On 2010/04/24 13:19, Luis Henriques wrote: > > Luis, can you send the latest version of your diff please. There were > > at least two and I'm not sure which one people should be testing. > > Then I'll test it on AR5213A 5.9 phy 4.3 rf2112a 4.6, WOR0W which works > > ok with the existing driver. > > For testing the patch on this AR5213A, I would recommend you to use the > first version I sent which you can find at: > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=126438116226809&w=2 > > The reason for using this one is because it's the only one that makes > any difference. All the other versions of this patch still work on > my card but made no big difference on the others.
you had another version in <20100126231526.ga4...@hades.my.domain> which fixes the rf id on 14.2 chips, which i think we should have. > > Other people: if you have ath(4) devices please mail the full dmesg. > > In the subject line include the line from 'dmesg|grep ath0:' and > > write the word 'works' or 'broken' at the start of the subject. > > > > e.g. > > > > Subject: works: ath0: AR5213A 5.9 phy 4.3 rf2112a 4.6, WOR0W > > Subject: broken: ath0: AR5424 14.2 phy 7.0 rf 0.0, WOR0W > > > > For now I want these for the existing in-tree driver. Doesn't have > > to be current - 4.6 or newer would be ok. > > I hope to be able to submit a new patch during the weekend but, > again, I can only guarantee it will work on my card. Adam has > volunteered to test any new patches (and several others are also > available for testing) but this is a very slow process. This is > what I call the _real_ remote debugging :-) fwiw, looking over dmesglog, it seems like the 10.x phys are mainly just in apple machines, all the other 5424 I've seen are 14.x been hunting for it, but I'm not sure where my 5424 is at the moment...
