On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 15:20, Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:25:12 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > >> It's only been 25 years. I think we can depend on prototypes and >> const now. > > Is there really a reason to break K&R compatibility in the generated > code? What problem are you solving?
I opened the generated file to look at it. It was ugly. I don't see how K&R compat helps us. None of the headers in /usr/include are K&R anymore. How would one compile the generated output?
