>On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:38:07 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > >> True, I phrased that poorly. What I'm assuming is that the code will >> be built by a compiler that supports the const keyword. Or in other >> words, if you're using a 25 year old cross compiler, I don't think >> it's unreasonable to expect you to dig up a 25 year old cross yacc >> either (or the yacc from openbsd 5.4). >> >> Who is actually using yacc to generate code for a compiler that >> doesn't accept const? > >Sudo 1.7.x still compiles on K&R, mostly for the benefit of the >bundled HP-UX compiler that has C89 support disabled.
That feels like a disservice to the world.
