On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:38:07 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:

> True, I phrased that poorly. What I'm assuming is that the code will
> be built by a compiler that supports the const keyword. Or in other
> words, if you're using a 25 year old cross compiler, I don't think
> it's unreasonable to expect you to dig up a 25 year old cross yacc
> either (or the yacc from openbsd 5.4).
> 
> Who is actually using yacc to generate code for a compiler that
> doesn't accept const?

Sudo 1.7.x still compiles on K&R, mostly for the benefit of the
bundled HP-UX compiler that has C89 support disabled.

 - todd

Reply via email to