On 07/03/2016 19:14, Jason McIntyre wrote: > all of your changes appear to be for the sake of preference, rather than > that what's there is incorrect. it would be better then to state why you > think your change is neccessary. i don;t feel any of these changes are > improvements. > > language is flexible, that's all. i'm not generally in favour of > changing something just because we can.
Sure thing. 1) An interface is not a type of address, referencing the interface triggers the system to look up the address associated with the interface. 2) you reference in a particular syntax, not of a particular syntax 3) I agree for the changes in the last paragraph doesn't add anything but changes style. twice is succinct :) Regards Sevan
