> So I'm skeptical about this BFS scheduler. Don't get me wrong; I do > think the scheduler needs attention. But I'm not sure a scheduler > designed for interactive desktop use is the best option for OpenBSD. > I'm willing to be proven wrong. But that means we need careful > benchmarking on a wide variety of workloads and hardware.
I don't think this scheduler is making things better because of it's scheduling behaviour. I think the scheduling choices it makes are hiding a poor-performing artifact we have elsewhere.
