Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > clang already recognizes (and ignores) -fforce-addr but errors out > on -fno-force-addr. This breaks the build of ports/databases/qdbm: > > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/amd64-clang/2017-04-14/databases/qdbm.log > > Fixing the port is easy, but so is ignoring -fno-force-addr. > -fno-force-addr should probably be pushed upstream if the latter is > preferred. > > Thoughts?
If the option is obsolete, I'd say we'd be doing the world a favor by upstreaming a patch to fix qdbm.
