Andre Stoebe wrote: > Hi, > > I, too, would like to have a way of signing the gzip archive in a > reproducible way, so here's a diff that uses -n, similar to gzip(1). > > However, if that's a bad idea, I'm fine with continuing to use an > unsigned gzip archive and creating a sigfile with signify.
Let me think on this for a bit. Seems reasonable, though.
