On 24 Oct, Aaron Turner wrote:
> I understand that a lot of people are willing to take that risk, and I
> suppose that's their choice. But IMHO the OSWG should look at this sort
> of thing and think what is best for the community (specifically the
> end-user whom you're trying to help) and try to pursuade authors to act
> accordingly. The problem with choices, with regards to licenses, is that
> few people really realize the implication of their choices; so it's all
> too easy to make the wrong choice.
I agree. I personally think that any open document project, OSWG, or
LDP, should mandatorily insist that license allow derivative works.
That being said, I'd be happy to operate within a project that allowed
the author the flexibility to pick and choose too.
What I'm after is an open documentation project that has some standards,
even if they're not perfect.
Terry
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
