On 24 Oct, John D. Blair wrote: > Deb, > > What's your reasoning for disallowing distribution of derivative works? > Is it just that the licenses for this sort of thing are young and > perhaps haven't yet been properly worked through? John, What Deb has listed in a minimum set of licensing freedoms. All this list is saying is that your license does not have to allow derivative works, not that your licence *cannot* allow derivative works. Freedom to produce derivative works optional. Anything not on the list is optional. Terry -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing ... terry
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licens... Aaron Turner
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licens... terry
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licens... Deb Richardson
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licens... Droll web aberration
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licens... Sandy Harris
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licens... Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licens... Deb Richardson
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing ... Deb Richardson
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discussion Aaron Turner
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discussion terry
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discussion Jason Henry Parker
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discussion terry
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discussion Deb Richardson
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discussion terry
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discussio... Paul Jones
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discu... Deb Richardson
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discussion Poet/Joshua Drake
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discussio... Deb Richardson
- Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discussio... Aaron Turner
