On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > another idea would be to have a second file for this purpose. So if you > have foo.t you'd add foo(.t?).conf.in in the same directory with > whatever things you want. This is a snap to add (we already scan t/conf > for .in files now we can just scan all dirs under t/ recursively.
sure, that would be easy. but would we then have yet another file to implement the CONFIGURE routine? in any case, it would be nice if a .t could be totally self-contained with all three.
