On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:06:41PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote: > I had few segfaults, but those were with flood-0.4 tarball. I've created > few ridiculus URL's today and tested them against current CVS (flood, > apr, apr-util). No segv's at all. Could we ask the person that submited > this bug to recheck it with current CVS?
Cool. Well, the person who submitted the bug is either me or Aaron. Yeah, but I think we fixed that up a while ago. So, yeah, feel free to toss it in STATUS. > BTW. flood-0.4 tarball is bad. As soon as we get a few more bugs out, we > schould tag flood-0.5 with recent apr and apr-util and make a nice > tarball. I think we actually tagged "1.0" when we were doing the OSCON presentation, but we never released it. So, it'd probably make a lot of sense to check in your pending patches and release 1.0 and then move on. The one thing I would like to see before 1.0 is an 'install' Makefile target. I'll try to add that this weekend (if not before). -- justin
