On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:47:14 -0700 Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 10:29:54AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > I think we actually tagged "1.0" when we were doing the OSCON > > presentation, but we never released it. > > Yeah, we already tagged FLOOD_1_0, so let's put up what we have. > The install targets would be nice, but we already tagged 1.0. :) > Besides, we don't need install targets for 1.0, it's just a number. So... here's my proposal for 1.0 timeline. - fix install target so we can install flood amd examples off $SRCDIR - fix few more bugs from STATUS (I'm on it) - move tag on changed files and roll tarball Personally I consider lack of install target as a showstopper. It just simply doesn't feel right to move binaries by hand when you are 1.0. And since this looks like a trival fix, why not go for it? :) regards, -- Jacek Prucia 7bulls.com S.A. http://www.7bulls.com/
