On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:25:27PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > No, that's not fine. I've misread the code. Apache::TestRunPerl requires > mod_perl. I'm updating the docs. You need to use Apache::TestRun if you > don't want to run mod_perl.
Excellent. Using TestRun simply skips the response tests. Very smart. > Admittedly it'd be better to call it Apache::TestRunModPerl, but the > assumption that Perl == mod_perl (of course mod_cgi could be just as well). > May be we could have changed it but we don't want to break test suites of > people who use that name. I'm guessing that not many folks who are using A::T are subclassing TestRun directly. Perhaps there could be a TestRunCGI module to help differentiate which module to subclass. I'm not sure that would have helped me much though since I would have ignorantly tried to use the same TEST.PL script in both locations (on a mod_perl enabled and non-mod_perl enabled server), not realizing everything that's going on behind the scenes. William -- Knowmad Services Inc. http://www.knowmad.com
