On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:25:27PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
No, that's not fine. I've misread the code. Apache::TestRunPerl requires mod_perl. I'm updating the docs. You need to use Apache::TestRun if you don't want to run mod_perl.
Excellent. Using TestRun simply skips the response tests. Very smart.
;)
Admittedly it'd be better to call it Apache::TestRunModPerl, but the assumption that Perl == mod_perl (of course mod_cgi could be just as well). May be we could have changed it but we don't want to break test suites of people who use that name.
I'm guessing that not many folks who are using A::T are subclassing TestRun directly. Perhaps there could be a TestRunCGI module to help differentiate which module to subclass. I'm not sure that would have helped me much though since I would have ignorantly tried to use the same TEST.PL script in both locations (on a mod_perl enabled and non-mod_perl enabled server), not realizing everything that's going on behind the scenes.
I think all is needed is a good clear documentation. And Apache::TestRunPerl will now tell you if you try to use it w/o having mod_perl.
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
