On Jul 9, 2004, at 1:01 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
I think we should try to be consistent with all TestM* frontends, no?
Yes.
I think we kept this message, in the same fashion to MakeMaker writing what does it do. and it's good to tell the user that a utility was created, so they know they can use it. e.g. we tell people to use
t/TEST -v foo
when running specific tests, so it's good to know that it was created.
Hrm. That's a point. I was just thinking that it might be good not to change the usual output of MM or MB unless we were asked to be verbose.
But I don't have a strong feeling about that.
Me, neither, it was just easy to add. I'll revert the change if others feel strongly about it.
Regards,
David
