oops, thanks for the subject :)
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 9, 2004, at 1:01 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
I think we should try to be consistent with all TestM* frontends, no?
Yes.
I think we kept this message, in the same fashion to MakeMaker writing what does it do. and it's good to tell the user that a utility was created, so they know they can use it. e.g. we tell people to use
t/TEST -v foo
when running specific tests, so it's good to know that it was created.
Hrm. That's a point. I was just thinking that it might be good not to change the usual output of MM or MB unless we were asked to be verbose.
But I don't have a strong feeling about that.
Me, neither, it was just easy to add. I'll revert the change if others feel strongly about it.
It's up to you, since at the moment you are the only MB dev -- you are the king :)
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
