Stas Bekman wrote: [...]
But, yes, the transition could be made 100% perfect, by keeping have_ as it is, and adding a new interface which doesn't add the skip reason. But we need to find an unambiguous name for it. skip_foo will be good, but we have a general function have(), which can't be replaced with skip(). So may be want_foo() is a better choice. Or may be you have a better name...
Sorry, that last para is contradicting itself. So again, I suggest to keep have_lwp, and remove the skip functionality from it, e.g.:
# Always allow redirection.
my $redir = have_lwp ? [qw(GET HEAD POST)] : 1; # no skip
Apache::TestRequest::user_agent(reset => 1,
requests_redirectable => $redir);but having a new function that will be have_foo+skip:
plan tests => 5, need_lwp, need_cgi, need_php;
or:
plan tests => 5, want ['cgi', 'lwp'];
so require_ won't work too, as we will need a standalone word too. I think need_ or want_, or must_ pretty intuitive in the plan context.
or may be add must_have_*, so have_* is for checking, and must_have_* is checking and requiring. may be it's too long to type, but I like it.
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
