Stas Bekman wrote: > so we probably need to introduce a new directive t_cmp_no() or something > similar which will be run as: > > ok t_cmp_no $received, qr/message/ > > and log as: > > # testing : whatever > # expected: ! (?-xism:message) > # received: [...] [notice] [client 127.0.0.1] message must not appear! > not ok 32 > > or something like that. internally it'd run !~, neq and != depending on > the arguments.
I suppose. however, with Test::More now fully integrated, I wonder why we need to add more of our own functions that merely mimic what Test::More already offers. in this case, you're asking for Test::More's unlike(). --Geoff
