Stas Bekman wrote:
so we probably need to introduce a new directive t_cmp_no() or something similar which will be run as:
ok t_cmp_no $received, qr/message/
and log as:
# testing : whatever # expected: ! (?-xism:message) # received: [...] [notice] [client 127.0.0.1] message must not appear! not ok 32
or something like that. internally it'd run !~, neq and != depending on the arguments.
I suppose.
however, with Test::More now fully integrated, I wonder why we need to add more of our own functions that merely mimic what Test::More already offers. in this case, you're asking for Test::More's unlike().
Two reasons:
- We still don't have Test::More in the 5.6.1 core (it was added in 5.6.2/5.8.0), so we can't rely on it being available.
- Test::More's verbose output doesn't work the way we want, it prints out the expected/received values only on failure, making it really hard to develop tests.
But otherwise I'm certainly not in favor to duplicate the API.
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
