anyway, in the end I guess I wouldn't suggest moving to T::M entirely just yet. but if you want to use it occasionally within certain tests I think that's fine.
Of course another alternative is to bundle a sufficient version of T::M under t/.
that's an idea. so long as it's not installed with 'make install'. or indexed by cpan either, I suppose.
anything living under t/ is not installed on 'make install' and not scanned by PAUSE.
I prefer to first see the output and then write the comparison test than the other way around. I don't understand why T::M doesn't allow an option to force the verbose output.
I dunno the politics here, but it might make for a nice enhancement. I'll look into it.
Great, thanks.
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
