lördag 22 januari 2005 02.24 skrev Stas Bekman: > Oden Eriksson wrote: > > torsdag 13 januari 2005 16.15 skrev Stas Bekman: > >>Oden Eriksson wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >>>>>The system is clean except for parts of mod_perl 1.x that seems to be > >>>>> a requisite to get this mod_perl pick up missing pieces. Here's > >>>>> what's installed: > >>>> > >>>>what do you mean requisite? you mean mp2 requires mp1? > >>> > >>>Maybe it's a thing of the past, or I'm just too tired right now. At one > >>>time I saw something like "Found mod_perl-1.x, good, will install > >>>relatively to Apache2/". And that message was despite the > >>>MP_INST_APACHE2=1 thing. > >> > >>Hmm, do you think it's a misleading message? I guess we could remove it > >> if MP_INST_APACHE2=1 is used explicitly. > > > > Sorry for the delay. Here's the output of this: > > > > /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL 'MP_CCOPTS=-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe > > -march=i586 -mtune=pentiumpro -fPIC' MP_INST_APACHE2=1 > > MP_APXS=/usr/sbin/apxs2 MP_APR_CONFIG=/usr/bin/apr-config > > INSTALLDIRS=vendor Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV > > MP_CCOPTS = -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i586 > > -mtune=pentiumpro -fPIC > > MP_INST_APACHE2 = 1 > > MP_APXS = /usr/sbin/apxs2 > > MP_APR_CONFIG = /usr/bin/apr-config > > mod_perl/1.29 installation detected...ok (installing relative to > > Apache2/) Configuring Apache/2.0.52 mod_perl/1.999.20 Perl/v5.8.6 > > OK, but I fail to see what it has to do with you thinking that mod_perl 1 > is required. If you didn't have modperl 1 installed you won't have had > this message, no?
Yes exactly. Now this is crystal clear. Thanks Stas. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson
